by Mike Thomas
4 January 2025
Generative AI will create images for you based on text prompts. For instance, using ChatGPT and DALL-E, and the prompt “Create 16 by 9 photo realistic image of woman flying steampunk spaceship” resulted in the following image:
I have been using AI to create cute little graphics like for our Christmas Party. I used the prompt “generate a facebook header for the Arundel Camera Club Christmas Party featuring Santa holding a camera” to generate the following image:
It’s clear that AI Technology is here to stay and advancing quickly. I can certainly see why AI is threatening the livelihoods of artists and photographers. Advances in creating more realistic images and even videos may pose a threat to writers, models, and actors. In fact, the recent strike in Hollywood was partly in response to AI. Besides threatening livelihoods, AI is training on the work of artists and writers. Many see this as steeling.
Club Rules with Respect to AI
Ethics aside, our club rules do not allow club members to enter images into competitions that were created by AI.
Specifically, our contest rules state:
“It is unethical, constitutes plagiarism, and violates copyright law to simply copy an image (even in another medium) that was made by someone else. This includes the use of images generated by artificial intelligence (AI) that was trained using other artists’ work. Images determined to be copies of another’s artist’s work, or to have used another’s work, will be disqualified.”
AI Critique
Are there other ways to use AI to help with your photography? What if you could use AI to critique your contest entries before submitting them into contest. Could that help you improve your images? Maybe.
To test this, I submitted four images to ChatGPT and asked it to critique the four images.
ChatGPT Prompt: Describe and critique the following four photographs.
Could you provide descriptions of the photographs, or upload the images if you’re able? With descriptions, I can provide critiques and suggest ways to enhance their aesthetic or technical aspects. |
I uploaded the four images to ChatGPT and here is the response.
Photo 1 (Image1 – Bird in Flight)
|
Photo 2 (Image2 – Perched Bird)
|
Photo 3 (Image3 – Bird Clinging to a Branch)
|
Photo 4 (Image4 – Another Bird in Flight)
General Recommendations:
These are fantastic captures showcasing great skill and patience. Small tweaks could elevate them further! |
ChatGPT Prompt: Compare and contrast the four images
Here’s a comparison and contrast of the four images, focusing on key aspects like composition, lighting, action, and background: 1. Subject Behavior
2. Focus and Sharpness
3. Composition
4. Background and Environment
5. Action vs. Stillness
6. Color and Lighting
Overall Assessment
Each photograph brings something unique to the table, demonstrating different facets of bird photography, from action and behavior to detail and composition. |
ChatGPT Prompt: which image is best
The best image is Image 2 (the perched bird) due to the following reasons:
While the action shots (Image 1 and Image 4) are exciting and technically impressive, and Image 3 has a unique pose, Image 2 stands out for its overall polish, aesthetic appeal, and technical execution. |
ChatGPT Prompt: rank the four images
1st Place: Image 2 (The Perched Bird)
2nd Place: Image 3 (The Bird Clinging to the Branch)
3rd Place: Image 4 (Bird in Flight – Close Frame)
4th Place: Image 1 (Bird in Flight – Straight-on View)
Summary
Each image demonstrates excellent skill and highlights different aspects of bird photography, so all are commendable! |
You can refine your results by providing a more specific prompt.
ChatGPT Prompt: Analyze each photo including focus and clarity, color, composition, lighting, background, subject presentation
I won’t give the results for each photo due to the size of the output. But here is ChatGPT’s response for Image 1.
Image 1 (Bird in Flight – Straight-on View)
|
ChatGPT even provides a summary table and final thoughts.
Summary Table
Final Thoughts
|
Conclusion
I was surprised by the results. I did like the critiques. It gave me something to consider for all the images. So yes, using AI to critique your images may be useful. Remember AI is just a tool, and you are the artist. If you love an image, enter it. Make it your own.
You may not agree with the AI final ranking but then again, we don’t always agree with our human judges. While many of our volunteer judges are truly insightful and provide valuable critiques during contests, AI could be better than some of our less skilled judges. In fact, I think using AI could help train better judges. However, I don’t think AI can replace the human touch, the understanding and inspiration of art. We had a judge who liked trains, and no surprise gave an award to a train photo. We had a recent judge who assigned a great deal of meaning to the American flag because it resonated with him. So, art isn’t always about ISO, Shutter Speed, and Aperture.
Tools
I used the paid version of ChatGTP with the 4o model. There is a free version. There are also other models to choose from. ChatGPT has several commercial competing Large Language Models including Google Bard, Microsoft Bing AI, Anthropic Claude, Perplexity AI, etc. Using different LLMs and models will result in different responses. I wouldn’t even expect to always get consistent responses from the same tools and models.
ChatGPT used DALL-E 3 to create the images. There are several competing AI image generators including Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, etc.